LSN โ€” Local Sovereign Network

Every IP address has a name on the door. Some are real companies. Some are shell entities registered in jurisdictions where "know your customer" means "know how much they'll pay."

226 malicious IPs hide behind RIPE's own registry marker. 32 IPs are registered to "Private Customer." The system works exactly as designed โ€” which is the problem.

The Registration Layer

RDAP (Registration Data Access Protocol) is the system that maps IP addresses to organizations. Every IP allocation must have a registrant. Every registrant must provide contact details. The theory: abuse reports reach responsible parties. The reality: 11,411 shared RDAP organization links reveal an accountability vacuum.

Top RDAP Organizations by Malicious IP Count (threat >20)

OrganizationIPsASNsCountriesAvg ThreatNature
Microsoft Corporation24822254.6Hyperscaler
RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT226793856.5Registry marker
DigitalOcean, LLC1671857.4VPS
Google LLC14341053.1Hyperscaler
IRT-ACEVILLEPTELTD-SG1221958.6Shell company
ZWIEBELFREUNDE1201156.1Tor nonprofit
RIPE NCC96191637.8Registry
DiGi Telecommunications911152.8Mobile ISP
IP Manager8510264.2Shell/reseller
Unredacted Inc821129.6Tor/privacy

The Shell Companies

ACEVILLE PTE LTD โ€” Singapore โ†’ Tencent โ†’ Everywhere

122 IPs registered to IRT-ACEVILLEPTELTD-SG. All route through Tencent (AS132203). Deployed across 9 countries despite Singapore registration. Average threat: 58.6. Individual IP threats: 84 to 100.

Sample: 43.128.237.224 (JP) โ€” threat 100 | 124.156.202.242 (SG) โ€” threat 100 | 43.166.137.151 (US) โ€” threat 98

Every ACEVILLE IP touching our honeypot is extremely high-threat. This isn't a hosting provider with some bad customers โ€” this is infrastructure purpose-built for attack.

The structure: a Singapore PTE LTD (private limited company, minimum $1 SGD share capital, no public disclosure requirements) purchases IP allocations from Tencent Cloud, then deploys scanning/attack infrastructure across Tencent's global regions. Singapore's corporate opacity provides the legal shield. Tencent's global infrastructure provides the network reach.

Cloud Innovation โ€” Seychelles โ†’ 17 ASNs โ†’ Opacity

A Seychelles-registered entity whose abuse phone (+248-4-610-795) spans 17 autonomous systems. Operating through Yisu Cloud HK (AS142403), Scloud Pte (AS142002), NEEVAI (AS59187), CNSERVERS (AS40065), and UCloud (AS135377).

This is the same entity documented in TI-2026-057F: registration fraud using jurisdiction mismatches. Cloud Innovation claims Seychelles incorporation while operating exclusively through Chinese/Hong Kong cloud providers. The Seychelles registration provides:

  • No beneficial ownership disclosure requirement
  • No mutual legal assistance treaties with major enforcement jurisdictions
  • 4-hour timezone offset from victims (harassment-proof abuse contact)
  • Bearer share provisions (anonymous ownership until 2020 reform)

"Private Customer" โ€” Maximum Opacity

32 IPs across 15 ASNs and 9 countries. Average threat: 65.3 โ€” the highest of any organization with 5+ IPs.

IPCountryASNThreatProvider
179.61.232.244US14670100WHG Hosting
191.101.33.110US14670100WHG Hosting
208.115.214.194FR4647598Limestone Networks
191.101.33.115US1467095WHG Hosting
31.58.144.12DE21560790Dataforest GmbH

WHG Hosting Services (AS14670) hosts multiple "Private Customer" IPs all at threat score 95-100. This is a hosting provider that either can't or won't identify its own customers in registration data. The RDAP record exists. The name on it is meaningless.

"IP Manager" โ€” The Reseller Layer

85 IPs across 10 ASNs. Average threat: 64.2. An entity whose business IS managing IP space โ€” buying allocations from RIRs and reselling to customers who need addresses without questions.

The reseller layer is where accountability disappears. The RIR sold to "IP Manager." IP Manager sold to... whom? The RDAP record stops at the reseller. The actual user โ€” the person running the scanner, the botnet, the C2 server โ€” is one hop beyond the registry's visibility.

The Registry Markers

RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT: 226 malicious IPs, 79 ASNs, 38 countries. This isn't an organization โ€” it's a maintenance object indicating "managed by RIPE NCC itself." When an IP block's RDAP record points to RIPE's own maintainer, it means the allocation hasn't been properly transferred to an end-user entity. These IPs exist in a registration limbo: allocated but not attributed.

RIPE-NCC-END-MNT: 67 IPs, 23 ASNs, 11 countries. Another registry marker โ€” "end-user maintainer" without actual organizational attribution. Combined with RIPE NCC's general record (96 IPs, 19 ASNs, 16 countries), over 389 malicious IPs hide behind RIPE registry markers โ€” accountability nominally assigned to the European internet registry itself.

APNIC (Asia Pacific): 35 IPs, 16 ASNs, 11 countries. The same pattern in Asia. Regional registries become inadvertent shields when downstream allocations aren't properly documented.

The Legitimate vs. Complicit Spectrum

CategoryExamplesIPsIntent
Legitimate (passive)Microsoft, Google, DigitalOcean558Abused by customers
Privacy-first (structural)Zwiebelfreunde, Emerald Onion, Unredacted262Anonymization by design
Lax enforcementFranTech, BuyVM, Contabo159Slow abuse response
Shell companiesACEVILLE, Cloud Innovation, IP Manager241Purpose-built opacity
Anonymous"Private Customer", registry markers421No identity provided

The spectrum from "passively abused" to "actively complicit" isn't binary. Microsoft doesn't facilitate attacks โ€” but their provisioning speed enables account churn. FranTech doesn't ignore abuse โ€” but their response time is measured in weeks. ACEVILLE doesn't pretend to be legitimate โ€” their entire business model is access without accountability.

Read Between the Lines

The RDAP system was designed when the internet was smaller and trust was assumed. Every IP allocation would have a responsible organization. Abuse reports would reach people who cared. Registration would mean identification.

What actually happened:

  • Shell companies in Seychelles, Singapore, and BVI became the registrants
  • "Private Customer" became an acceptable organization name
  • Regional registries became default abuse contacts for unattributed space
  • IP resellers created a layer of opacity between allocation and use

The system doesn't need to be broken to be useless. It just needs to allow entities like "Private Customer" to register 32 IPs across 15 ASNs with average threat 65.3, and for that to be compliant with all applicable policies.

The name on the door isn't a security feature. It's a compliance checkbox. And checkboxes have never stopped anyone determined to remain anonymous.

The Thread Forward

In TI-2026-053C, we follow the abuse contacts deeper. When one phone number is responsible for 39 malicious IPs, what happens when you call it? The abuse reporting system is designed for accountability โ€” but accountability requires someone to answer.

โš  Personal capacity. Research published independently โ€” not reflecting employer views. Derived from passive observation of attacks against personal infrastructure. Full disclaimer โ†’
โ† Previous The Transit Map โ€” 2 / 7 Next โ†’